Why has recovery been such a provocative concept? In fact, scientific papers have largely steered clear of this word, although it is alive and well on the Web. Their avoidance of the word is likely intentional. use the word “recovery” only once in their paper, in reference to the findings and claims of another study. They conclude, rather modestly, that these results “substantiate the possibility of optimal outcome,” demonstrating that some children with a clear early history and accurate diagnosis of ASD do indeed move into the entirely normal range of social and communication development later in childhood. They compared these children to a group of typically developing participants and found no differences on multiple measures independent of the group classification process. (2012) recruited 34 children with clearly documented early histories of ASD who no longer met criteria for any autism spectrum diagnosis and, even further, had lost all symptoms of ASD.

I call your attention to one article in particular that explores these concepts from a different angle and brings solid science to an understudied topic with a very controversial and contentious history, namely recovery from autism spectrum disorder (ASD).įein et al. All add to our understanding of the basic mechanisms and developmental pathways that underlie atypical child development. The effects of maternal depression and parental anxiety on child outcomes are also explored in this issue (Aktar et al., 2012 Hughes et al., 2012), as are the stability of symptoms in autism spectrum disorders (Corsello et al., 2012 Simonoff et al., 2012). This issue of the journal presents several articles that examine influences and predictors of child difficulties, such as avoidant behavior (Aktar et al., 2012†) and antisocial behavior (Rhee et al., 2012). The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and the field of developmental psychopathology in general, is keenly interested in stability and change, continuities and discontinuities, and prediction of outcome. Ajemian was set for May 24.Įditorial in The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Three other retirees also pleaded guilty this week, bringing the number of guilty pleas in the case to 21. Ajemian was among 32 defendants who have been arrested in the past two years. His patients received more than $90 million in disability benefits.ĭr. Ajemian, 63, received up to $1,200 for each of the fake assessments, as well as millions of dollars in health insurance payments. Ajemian told a judge in Federal District Court in Manhattan. The employees “were not in fact disabled and could have continued working in their railroad jobs, as they had no complaint right up to the time of their retirement date,” Dr. Ajemian, admitted that between the late 1990s and 2008 he invented “narratives” to justify illness and injury claims for hundreds of workers seeking to retire on disability. An orthopedist who was accused of taking cash payments for fake diagnoses and billing health insurance companies for unnecessary medical treatment in widespread disability fraud involving Long Island Rail Road workers pleaded guilty on Friday to conspiracy charges.

Anemona hartocollis schizophrenia